Sports & Outdoor Shops

Sports and Outdoor Shops

Sports and Outdoor Shops

This is a product guide from Ethical Consumer, the UK's leading alternative consumer organisation. Since 1989 we've been researching and recording the social and environmental records of companies, and making the results available to you in a simple format.

Sports & Outdoor retailers promote healthy outdoor living, however, do any of its policies respect the environment? 

This report includes:

  • Ethical and environmental ratings for 13 retailers
  • Best buy recommendations
  • Which retailers score badly on toxic & environmental reporting?
  • Is Sports Direct the only retailer with poor workers' rights? 
  • Ethical spotlight on Decathlon

Customise your scorecard ratings

How important to you?
Click the + icon to expand categories

To save your personal score settings and use them elsewhere around the site, please  Log In.



Score Ratings

Our ratings are live updated scores from our primary research database. They are based on primary and secondary research across 23 categories - 17 negative categories and 6 positive ones (Company Ethos and Product Sustainability). Find out more about our ethical ratings


Score table

The score table shows simple numerical ratings out of 20 for each product. The higher the score, the more ethical the company.

Move the sliders to customise these scores. 

Click on a product name to see the stories behind the score (subscribers only). 


Full Scorecard

The Full Scorecard shows the 'black marks' for each product, by each of the 17 negative categories. The bigger the mark, the worse the score. So for example a big black circle under 'Worker Rights' shows that the company making this product has been severely criticised for worker abuses.

Scores start at 14.  A small circle means that half a mark is deducted, a large circle means that a full mark is deducted.

Marks are added in the positive categories of Company Ethos and the five Product Sustainability columns (O,F,E,S,A).  A small circle  means that half a mark is added, a large circle means that a full mark is added.

The Full Scorecard is only available to subscribers. Click on the More Detail link at the top of the score table to access it.


Customising Rating Scores

Move the sliders to change the weighting given to each category. You can open up each of the 5 main categories by clicking on the + sign. This way you can compare products according to what's ethically important to YOU.  


Saving Your Customised Weightings

You must be signed-in to save your customisations. The weightings you have given to each category will be saved premanently (subscribers) or only for this visit to the site (registered users).  Once set, they will be used to calculate the scores in all the buyers' guides that you view. 


Stories and Data behind the scores

To see all the stories and research data behind the ratings you'll need to be a subscriber.

You must be signed-in to save your customisations. The weightings you have given to each category will be saved premanently (subscribers) or only for this visit to the site (registered users).  Once set, they will be used to calculate the scores in all the buyers' guides that you view. 


Stories and Data behind the scores

To see all the stories and research data behind the ratings you'll need to be a subscriber.

How the Sliders work
Move the sliders to see how different issues affect the score table
Refine each category by clicking the + icons
Save your settings (you need to be signed in first)
Key to expanded Score table

Best Buys

as of September/October 2016

As our ratings are constantly updated, it is possible that company ratings on the score table may have changed since this report was written.


While they aren’t eligible for the best buy label, our recommended buys for outdoor shops are Intersport and Trespass.  


They are the recommended buys as they have avoided some of the more extreme scandals of the other companies, and Intersport does not get so heavily marked down in the Animal Rights category as it does not sell anything containing animal down.


Yet both companies get our worst rating for Supply Chain Management, Environmental Reporting and Toxics. The fact that they are the recommended buys in this sector is just reflective of the low standards in the sector as a whole. 

to buy

Image: Patagonia


Image: Yogawear


Ethical Consumer makes a small amount of money from your purchase. This goes to fund our research and campaigning. We ethically screen all the sites we link to.







Related Content

Ethical Issues in the Outdoor Gear Industry

Last updated: September 2016



Sports & Outdoor Shops

Ethical policies in this sector are generally not impressive. In this guide we look at companies’ ratings, their use of zero hour contracts, their connection (or lack of it) with the outdoors, and supply chain issues. 

Sports Direct [see its extended company profile here] is by far the biggest player in the UK sports and outdoor shops market, being responsible for about half the sports retailing in the UK. JD Sports (in which Sports Direct has a minority stake) is the next biggest, accounting for 31% of the market in 2015. All of the other shops are tiny players by comparison, having only a few percent each.[1] 


Image: sports shop in ethical shopping guide


Companies with a passion for the outdoors?

Some outdoor gear manufacturers were born of their creator’s own passion for the outdoors, and are still controlled by their founders. Climber Yvon Chouinard, for example, still owns Patagonia. 

However, there are no major outdoor retailers in the UK that are similarly controlled by outdoor enthusiasts. Most were just offshoots of other retail businesses from the start – Decathlon, for example, was founded by the Mulliez family who already owned the French Auchan supermarket chain. While Go Outdoors was started by an obsessive climber, he stepped down in 2013, and the company’s current CEO was previously a director at Dixons.[2] 


Low scorers

All but Decathlon received our worst rating for Toxics and Environmental Reporting, and Decathlon only scraped a middle in both categories. 

All companies sell animal down in jackets and sleeping bags, and none of them have a policy to prevent live plucking of ducks and geese. Our feature on animal down explains the animal cruelty prevalent in the outdoor industry. 

There is only one key area in which these companies do well, and that is tax avoidance. Only Sports Direct and PAI Partners– the private equity owners of Cotswold Outdoor and Snow and Rock- have two or more high risk subsidiaries in jurisdictions we consider to be tax havens. 


Zero hours contracts

Sports Direct has recently been the subject of a huge amount of publicity over the treatment of its UK staff, who are largely on zero hours contracts. It has been widely reported as paying them less than the minimum wage, and intimidating them to the extent that they dare not even go to the toilet. 

Given this, some may be wondering whether other sports shops fare much better. And while it is only one factor, the extent to which a company uses zero hours contracts gives a flavour of its attitudes towards its staff. 

The winner in this area is Decathlon, which says on its website “we operate a “no zero hours contract” policy.” None of the other companies have publicly available policies. 

Although it can be hard to find out the extent to which a company uses zero hour contracts, we found a Go Outdoors job advert that mentions that zero hour contracts “are available”[2], and we found a JD Sports job advert that described working hours as “flexible”. [3] 

No information could be found regarding zero hours contracts at Intersport, Cotswold Outdoor, Blacks & Millets, Mountain Warehouse, Snow & Rock or Trespass.


Supply Chain Management


Every single company received our worst rating for Supply Chain Management, as they either had no explicit supply chain policies, or had very poor ones. 

However it is possible that companies in this sector may tend to have slightly better supply chains than other clothing companies just by default, due to the nature of their business. 

In 2014 the FairWear Foundation put out a report on the outdoor industry, claiming that the makers of outdoor gear tend to have more stable relationships with their suppliers than is common in the wider clothing sector.[4] If this is true, it is probably because making outdoor gear requires more specialised labour, and also because it is not sold so much on the basis of fleeting fashions so designs change less regularly, and thus it makes more sense to keep going with suppliers who know what they are doing. 

The FairWear Foundation looked at a sample of six outdoor companies, and found that they sourced 90% of their clothing from factories with which they had had a relationship for five or more years, which is very different from the bulk of the clothing industry. The outdoor companies also had fewer suppliers– in many cases just one or two- and used longer lead times.

The Foundation did not suggest that this meant that everything was hunky dory. It still found issues, particularly excessive overtime, in factories making outdoor clothing. But it argued that the more stable supplier relationships found in the industry put it in a good position to lead the clothing industry on workers rights in its supply chain.





Company behind the brand

Decathlon only represents about 3% of the sports retail market in the UK but is a much bigger player internationally, being one of the world’s largest sports retailers.[5] 

Decathlon is owned by the Mulliez family, one of the richest families in France. The family also owns the French Auchan supermarket chain, and several other French retailers in the DIY, clothes, and electronics fields. It has many different own-brand names, although the main ones are Quechua for Outdoor Gear and BTWIN for Cycling equipment. 

Decathlon has a moderately lack-lustre set of ethical policies, that are still better than most companies in the sector. As stated earlier, it does not use zero hours contracts and it gets our middle rating on environmental reporting and toxics, which puts it at the top of the league. But it got our worst rating for Supply Chain management and it has no policies on cotton sourcing at all. It uses animal down and we could find no reference to any policies to prevent live-plucking. 

See our extended company profile of Sports Direct.  


Want to know more?

If you want to find out detailed information about a company and more about its ethical rating, then click on a brand name in the Score table. 

This information is reserved for subscribers only. Don't miss out, become a subscriber today.



1. Mintel 2016, Sports Goods Retailing




5.  FairWear Foundation, 2014, Living Wage Engineering

6.  Mintel 2016, Sports Goods Retailing





Ethical made easy

Detailed ethical ratings for over 40,000 companies, brands and products, plus Ethical Consumer magazine.

30 day trial subscription - find out more

Navigate To: