G4S subject of human rights complaint
A formal OECD complaint has been lodged against multinational security contractor G4S for committing serious human rights violations at an Australian immigration detention centre.
G4S was contracted by the Australian government to oversee management and security at the Manus Island Centre between February 2013 and March 2014. Over this period, the Centre was repeatedly criticised by human rights organisations including the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees for breaching basic minimum standards of care. In February 2014, one detainee was killed and more than 60 others were injured in an outbreak of violence that is the subject of an ongoing Inquiry by the Australian Senate.
The complaint states that G4S failed to meet international standards and committing serious human rights violations in relation to conditions and abuse of asylum seekers detained at the Manus Regional Processing Centre. The complaint has been submitted in Australia and the United Kingdom by UK NGO Rights and Accountability in Development (RAID) and the Australian-based Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC). The OECD Guidelines are a set of Government-backed standards for responsible business conduct.
Executive Director of RAID, Patricia Feeney, told the Human Rights Law Centre that companies do not operate in a human rights vacuum.
“G4S Australia and its parent company in the UK have a responsibility under the OECD Guidelines not to cause or contribute to human rights violations. G4S cannot evade responsibility simply because those violations are sanctioned by the Australian Government,” said Ms Feeney.
The HRLC’s Director of Advocacy and Campaigns, Rachel Ball, said G4S’ direct involvement in the outbreak of violence at the Centre in February 2014 was of particular concern.
“G4S’ locally-employed security guards participated in some of the worst violence against asylum seekers. In addition to the violence, the regime of indefinite, arbitrary detention on Manus is itself a violation of international human rights law and conditions under G4S’ watch were consistently reported to be cruel and inhumane,” said Ms Ball.
Martin Appleby, a former G4S safety and security officer and training officer, has lashed out his former employer’s practices.
“G4S’ training and risk management processes were woefully inadequate. The company must shoulder some of the responsibility for the human rights abuses suffered by asylum seekers as a result,” said Mr Appleby.
This story has been added to our corporate database. The database powers all our live product guides, giving the score for each company on our rankings tables. Find out more about how we rate companies.
Ethical Consumer on Google+