In July 2021, Ethical Consumer viewed Biblio’s website for information on how the company managed workers' rights in its supply chain. No information was found.

Supply chain policy (Poor)
A strong policy would include the following commitments: no use of forced labour, permission of freedom of association, payment of a living wage, the restriction of working hours to 48 hours plus 12 overtime (without exception), no use of a child labour (under 15 or 14 if ILO exempt), no discrimination by race, sex or for any other reason.
As Biblio had none of these things, it received a poor rating for supply chain policy.

Stakeholder engagement (poor)
Ethical Consumer deemed it necessary for companies to demonstrate stakeholder engagement, such as through membership of the Ethical Trade Initiative, Fair Labour Association or Social Accountability International. Companies were also expected to engage with Trade Unions, NGOs and/or not-for-profit organisations which could systematically verify the company's labour standards, and for workers to have access to an anonymous complaints system, free of charge and in their own language.
As Biblio had none of these things, it received a poor rating for stakeholder engagement.

Auditing and Reporting (poor)
Ethical Consumer deemed it necessary for companies to have an auditing and reporting system. Results of audits should be publicly reported and quantitatively analysed. The company should have a scheduled and transparent audit plan that applies to their whole supply chain, including some second tier suppliers. The company should also have a staged policy for non-compliance. The costs of the audit should be borne by the company.
As Biblio had none of these things, it received a poor rating for Auditing and Reporting.

Difficult Issues (poor)
Ethical Consumer also deemed it necessary for companies to address other difficult issues in their supply chains. This would include ongoing training for agents, or rewards for suppliers meeting labour standards, or preference for long term suppliers. It would also include acknowledgement of audit fraud and unannounced audits, and measures taken to address the issue of living wages, particularly among outworkers, and illegal freedom of association.
As Biblio had none of these things, it received a poor rating for Difficult Issues.

Overall, although Biblio had a turnover of less than £10.2m, as the company did not detail any measures that addressed workers rights in its supply chain, it received a worst Ethical Consumer rating for its supply chain management.

Reference:

Biblio UK website (20 July 2021)