Ethical Consumer

Ethical Consumer

Buyer's guide to low energy lightbulbs

   

This is a free buyer's guide from Ethical Consumer, the UK's leading alternative consumer organisation. We research the social and environmental records of companies.

 

More detailed versions of this guide are available. See the links at the bottom of the page.

   

Best Buys as of July/August 2007

Best Buys logo


As our ratings are constantly updated, it is possible that company ratings on the ethiscore website may have changed since this report was written.


Omicron (01480 869 000) LEDs and CFLs come out as the overall Best Buy. They are available online from www.bltdirect.co.uk tel: 01473 716418.
Next best are Kosnic LEDs and CFLs (0845 838 6851).
BioBulb (0845 230 4200) and Megaman (0845 408 4625) also do well but don't make LEDs.
Philips LEDs and CFLs (01293 776774) come out as the best widely available brand.

Buying online
A number of websites specialise in the sale of low energy light bulbs. Here is a selection:
www.bltdirect.com, www.capcarbon.co.uk, www.efficientlight.co.uk, www.gogreenlights.co.uk, www.greenshop.co.uk


Brand
Rating
Omicron LED light bulbs15
Omicron low energy light bulbs14.5
Kosnic LED light bulbs14
BioBulb CFL low energy light bulbs13.5
Kosnic low energy CFL light bulbs13.5
Megaman low energy light bulbs13
Micromark LED light bulbs12
Philex low energy light bulbs11.5
Sylvania low energy light bulbs11.5
B&Q LED light bulbs8.5
B&Q low energy light bulbs8
Philips LED light bulbs6.5
Philips low energy CFL light bulbs6
IKEA low energy light bulbs5.5
Osram low energy light bulbs2.5
GE low energy light bulbs2

The higher the rating the more ethical the brand. This whole scorecard was last updated from our database on 14 October 2009 but some individual company ratings may have changed since then. Up to the minute information can be seen by subscribers using Ethiscore.
Learn more about our ratings.

Lighting the way

Mary Rayner and Hanna Backman take a shine to low energy light bulbs

Good news

Environmental issues in the light bulb industry have come a long way since we last covered them in 2005. Talks are underway at a European level about phasing out the sale of traditional style incandescent light bulbs. Some retailers have made public commitments to stop selling non-energy efficient ones. Older style low energy compact fluorescent (CFL) light bulbs have been replaced with a new generation of non-flicker, brighter and dimmable models. And super-efficient LED bulbs are finding their way into the mainstream consumer market. So, is it all good news?

Lights out for incandescents

According to the Greenpeace light bulbs campaign: “80 per cent of bulbs in UK homes are inefficient, wasteful incandescent bulbs. But, for around 30 years, an altogether better option has been available to us - the energy saving bulb, or CFL. CFLs use five times less energy, last up to 12 times longer and could save UK consumers around £1.2 billion in electricity bills per year. If all domestic bulbs in the UK were CFLs, then we could cut our CO2 emissions by over five million tonnes - more than the CO2 emitted by 26 of the world’s lowest emitting countries combined.”

The incandescent light bulb may soon lose its status as the most common bulb, as manufacturers and retailers are beginning to commit to phasing it out. They’ve been a huge commercial success since they were brought onto the market by Thomas Edison. But they’re very inefficient, emitting far more of the energy they use in heat than they do in light (see ‘lumens per watt’ on table).

The EU Commission is drawing up proposals on energy efficiency requirements for office and street lighting “to be adopted by 2008” and on incandescent bulbs and other forms of lighting in private homes by 2009. The EU requires meeting “A target of 20% energy efficiency savings by 2020, requiring homes, offices and streets to switch to energy-saving lighting”. Gordon Brown has also pledged to phase out old light bulbs by 2011. The proposed phase out will only cover basic ‘A’ shaped incandescents at this stage; candle bulbs, golf ball or mini globe bulbs and other decorative and special incandescent bulbs will come later.

Retailers have taken the bull by the horns with plans to phase out the sale of old light bulbs - Currys did it first in the UK, followed shortly by the Co-operative Group. Big companies are showing varying levels of support for the proposed phase-out, but none appear to be going as far as retailers and withdrawing basic ‘A’ shaped incandescents before 2011. So far, Philips has been the scheme’s most vocal corporate supporter, although it appears to be moving slower in the US where it is working with environmental campaign and industry groups on a phase-out date of 2016.

On an international level, Australia was the first country to announce a ban on the traditional light bulb. Canada, Chile and US states New Jersey and California are also considering a ban. Also, over in the USA, Wal-Mart announced plans last summer to sell 100 million CFL bulbs in one year.

Light bulb comparison table
Bulb type Conventional incandescent Halogen CFL LED
Price* 30p-60p £3 £2-£10 £9-£25
Life (hours) 800-100 2,000-3,000 6,000-10,000 50,000-100,000
Lumens per watt 13-17 16-21 40-80 40-100
*varies widely depending on make, type and quantity


Manufacturers moving on?

The manufacturing industry would like us to believe that it is also pushing in this direction. The three largest light bulb makers in the world teamed up in March to push for energy-saving alternatives in a bid to cut carbon dioxide emissions. Their strategy includes “public incentives to encourage consumers to purchase more efficient products and setting performance standards that will eliminate the least efficient products from the market.”(1) Given a history of reticence towards the CFL, it will come as no surprise to learn that this recent statement by the European Lamp Companies [ELC] Federation, whose members include General Electric, Siemens and Royal Philips Electronics, did not give a concrete time frame or target.

Despite Philips being one of the leading manufacturers committed to phasing out incandescent light bulbs, it has been criticised by Greenpeace for having the largest market share of incandescent bulbs in India (30%). The NGO is now calling for Philips to extend the same environmental consciousness to its Indian strategy and stop selling the hazardous light bulb in India.(2) The Greenpeace-led Ban the Bulb campaign is calling for the end of incandescent light bulbs through innovation and legislation.

In response to a questionnaire sent by Ethical Consumer, B&Q stated: “...we can confirm that space devoted to energy saving bulbs in our stores will increase to 25% from September 2007 and we will be improving our range to include more A rated bulbs and LED bulbs as an alternative to some halogen bulbs”.


Disposing of CFLs

The mercury content in the average CFL - no more than 5 milligrams - would fit on the tip of a ballpoint pen, but it’s still a hazardous material.(9) More often than not light bulbs are broken when they’re disposed of. When that happens with a CFL, the mercury vaporises and is deposited. It then is absorbed into plant and animal systems, as well as the soil.(10)

However, since a compact fluorescent bulb uses 75% less energy than an incandescent bulb, and lasts at least six times longer, it is responsible for far less mercury pollution in the long run. A coal-burning power plant will emit four times more mercury to produce the electricity for an incandescent bulb than for a compact fluorescent.(11)

Because of their mercury content, CFLs create waste disposal problems. Used bulbs need to be recycled rather than go in the bin. Within the EU, CFL lamps are subject to the WEEE recycling scheme. The retail price includes an amount to pay for recycling and manufacturers and importers have an obligation to collect and recycle CFL lamps. Local authorities can inform on where to recycle bulbs in every area, although only a few authorities have set up their own scheme.

Notably IKEA is currently the only major retailer offering CFL recycling points.(12) Megaman say it doesn’t take its own lamps back, but is arranging recycling bins through a company called City Electrical Factors (tel. 01282 614786). According to Megaman, all used lamps are recycled at its mercury-recovery plant that prevents unsafe disposal of mercury. It has also adopted lead-free glass tubes and low mercury levels of 3mg, which it claims is an industry first.(13)


CFLs - frequently asked questions

Currently, CFLs are the most easily-accessible low energy light bulb on the market. Consumers have, rightly in the past, had reservations about certain features of CFLs, but these now seem largely to have been resolved. Here are some common misconceptions:
1. Frequent switching reduces the life of CFLs: a CFL’s life is no longer affected by switching. The current standards for ‘Energy Saving Recommended’ accreditation requires over 3,000 switching cycles per 8,000 hours of tested life.
2. CFLs need to be left switched on for more than 45 minutes as they consume so much energy when first switched on: there is no reason to keep a CFL switched on for longer than a normal bulb as they do not consume any greater energy during start up and run very efficiently immediately after the first 2 or 3 seconds.
3. CFLs give a colder colour light than ordinary bulbs: under the Energy Saving Trust’s ‘Energy Saving Recommended’ accreditation, CFLs have to emit the same warm light tone as incandescents.
4. CFLs flicker: CFLs give a constant, flicker free, non-stroboscopic light. They operate at high frequency through their electronic controller at between 30,000-50,000 hertz.
5. You can’t dim CFLs: there are new lamps available right now that you can dim on ordinary domestic dimmer switches or alternately by staged dimming using a standard light switch. The number of these types of products is increasing.
6. Some CFLs seem to start very slowly, don’t give the light they promise or don’t last as long as they claim: beware of poor quality, cheap lamps: make sure that you only buy CFLs with the ‘Energy Saving Recommended’ logo on the box from the major manufacturers. This will show that they are of the very best quality and have received independent third party accreditation in meeting light output and life standards.
Information courtesy of the Lighting Association www.lightingassociation.com tel: 01952 290905.


Energy labelling

Most consumers do not select energy efficient light bulbs by energy label, but by technology. There is, however, a full EU energy label scheme for light bulbs, like that for other domestic appliances such as fridges and washing machines. Generally speaking, on the A-G scale, most CFLs have a rating of A or B, halogen bulbs are D rated and conventional incandescent bulbs are E or F rated.

The Energy Saving Trust’s “energy saving recommended” label is found on nearly 200 light bulbs – look for the blue logo. Certain models of the following brands covered on the table carry the label:
Regular-shaped CFLs: GE, Ikea, Megaman, Osram, Philips, Sylvania.
Candle-shaped CFLs: GE, Ikea, Megaman, Osram, Philips.

Contact the Energy Saving Trust for more detailed information (see links section).


Working conditions

Supply chain policies
Ikea is the only major company on the table with an independently monitored code of conduct for workers’ rights at supplier factories. Its latest social and environmental report is quite transparent about problems it is encountering in its supply chain. For example, it has commissioned extra audits in countries where child labour had been identified as a problem. Ikea admitted that it had particular problems with child labour at suppliers in China. We welcome this sort of transparency in reporting as it allows more open discussion with campaign groups and encourages other companies to be more honest about issues in their supply chains.

Of the smaller companies, Ecozone (BioBulb), Kosnic and Megaman did provide us with some information on their supply chains, but none was sufficient to achieve our middle rating. Omicron provided us with a copy of its audit report, and disclosed the name of the independent auditors it used in its Chinese factories.


Country of origin

Without exception, of the companies that replied to our questionnaire, all produced at least one type of light bulb in China. Working conditions can be very poor and independent unions are effectively illegal, making independent auditing of supply chain policies important. Companies only receive a mark under our Human Rights column if they source from more than one country on our list of oppressive regimes. This is to penalise companies that routinely source from several oppressive regimes, rather than just one. Where a company has not disclosed country of origin to us, and operates in a sector where sourcing from oppressive regimes is common, it receives a small mark under Human Rights.


LEDs – the way forward?

LEDs have been around for a long time, but are only just making their way into the mainstream consumer market. At the moment, LEDs for consumer use are generally only in the shape of a halogen bulb – or GU10 as they are commonly called – meaning they can be ‘retrofitted’ into recessed ceiling lights. A few traditionally shaped LED light bulbs are available, though aren’t currently very easy to get hold of on the high street.

At the moment, it seems that LEDs don’t produce the quality of light that either halogen or the new generation of CFLs do. But it shouldn’t be too long before we see LED bulbs alongside the current offering in mainstream shops. Advances in technology should see them becoming brighter, and cheaper, in the not too distant future. Advocates of energy efficient lighting are predicting that LEDs will in the end replace CFLs as the bulb to have.

If you’d like to use LED bulbs in your house, then we’d suggest you trial one or two to see what the light is like. The current advice seems to be that they’re bright enough for use as side lights, but not for lighting a whole room. They’re currently more expensive than CFLs, but you will save money in the long run as they last even longer (see light bulb comparison table).

A 3.4 watt LED is said to be suitable as a direct replacement for a standard 40 watt incandescent lightbulb (or a 10 watt CFL bulb). The only traditionally shaped LED light bulbs we can find for sale in the UK are 1 watt (from Omicron). A 3.4 watt traditionally shaped LED bulb has been launched in the Netherlands under the Pharox brand name. It has yet to find its way to the UK, so has not been included on the table. The bulb was created by Lemnis Lighting, a technology company reputedly managed by two members of the Philips family.(20)

Halogen-style GU10 LED bulbs are already on sale in B&Q and also from Micromark, Omicron and Philips. Traditional light bulb shape LEDs will be in stock in most B&Q stores from September 2007. Omicron – a Best Buy – 1 watt LEDS are available online from www.bltdirect.co.uk, priced from £8.99 - £10.99.

A spokesperson from Osram said that it had many consumer LED products and that retrofit LEDs would be introduced into consumer markets in the near future.(18) Philips said it had a number of new product lines for the home and that other LED products were set for launch in autumn 2007.(19)


Links

Energy Saving Trust for the ‘energy saving recommended’ label: www.energysavingtrust.org.uk, 0800 512 012
Greenpeace light bulbs campaign: www.greenpeace.org.uk/climate/light-bulbs, 020 7865 8100
Lighting chapter in “How to live a low-carbon life: the individual’s guide to stopping climate change”, Chris Goodall, ISBN: 978-1-84407-426-6
www.treehugger.com/design_architecture/lighting/ for discussions on low energy lighting


References

1 Toby Sterling, Associated Press 02 Mar 2007 www.business-humanrights.org/Categories/Sectors/Furnishings/Lightinglightbulb
2 www.greenpeace.org, viewed 14/5/07
4 B&Q ECRA light bulbs questionnaire reponse, 5/07
5 GE ECRA light bulbs questionnaire response, 5/07
6 Osram ECRA light bulbs questionnaire response, 5/07
7 Philips ECRA light bulbs questionnaire response, 5/07
8 Richard Buckle at SLI Sylvania, conversation with ECRA, 17/5/07
9 “Mercury in energy-saving bulbs worries scientists”, Lisa Von Ahn, Reuters, 27/3/07
10 “Mercury in energy-efficient light bulbs raises concerns” Allison Jones, Canadian Press, Canada.com, 29/4/07
11 www.treehugger.com, “What about Mercury from compact fluorescents?” by Michael Graham Richard, Gatineau, Canada on 17/6/05
12 www.greenpeace.org.uk/climate/cfl-bulbs-the-myths, 5/07
13 www.megamanuk.com, 15/3/07
14 Nuclear Engineering International Buyers Guide to Nuclear Power:www.connectingpower.com, 15/5/06
15 www.peri.umass.edu: Top corporate air polluters named, 11/5/06
16 www.havells.com, 18/5/07
17 Greenpeace Business: 80, 2/05
18 SACOM: Clean Computers Campaign: Report on Labour Rights in the Computer Industry in China, 10/1/07
18 Osram ECRA light bulbs questionnaire response, 5/07
19 Philips ECRA light bulbs questionnaire response, 5/07
20 www.treehugger.com/files/2007/02/new_led_lamp_ph.php, viewed 22/5/07
21 Email from Richard Buckle, Marketing Manager at Havells Sylvania, 22/5/07



   

Download the Low Energy Light Bulbs report in PDF format for £3. This research report pdf contains a more detailed ratings table, plus all the company stories behind the ratings and details of company ownership.

See a sample pdf research report.

 


 

   

Sign up to Ethical Consumer on a 4 week trial

 

 

 

Sign up to our monthly email newsletter

 

 

 

   

11 comments so far...

Lighting the way

You say that a low energy light bulb is likely to last about 10,000 hours (issue 95). I have just had to replace one such bulb on my landing. It has been lit for 24 hours a day for about 5 years. This works out at about 43,000 hours- not bad!

Eira Hughes, Cheshire.

By EC Letters Editor on   07/05/2008 12:14

Lumin8

Lumin8 seem to now be called "Energy Saving World" and appear to only stock GE lightbulbs, a company that comes bottom on the Ethiscore!

By Helen Sanderson on   07/05/2008 12:15

Re: Buyer's guide to low energy lightbulbs

Although you say that cheap, poorly made flourescents take longer to start and give low light levels. I have bought expensive, leading manufacturer product that does exactly the same. Buyer beware.

Also I do not read anywhere about having to make up the (less) heat given off by low energy lightbulbs by gas or electricity. So no carbon savings there.

By Paul Partridge on   08/10/2008 08:07

Fluorescent lights hurt my eyes!

I understand the push to replace incandescent light bulbs with more efficient ones, BUT and that is a big but, that should not be done compulsory and without considering health.

It is well known in Europe that fluorescent bulbs and tubes are good for the wallet but bad for the health.
I personally have light sensitivity to anything other than natural light (sun & fire as in incandescent bulbs). Fluorescent artificial light (which doesn't have the whole natural spectrum at the correct ratio) hurts my eyes A LOT! Several people I know also prefer natural light, even though artificial one doesn't hurt them. Also fluorescent bulbs are generally not dimmable and don’t work in some applications (e.g. ovens, lava lamps, etc).

By Michael on   29/12/2008 01:39

Re: Buyer's guide to low energy lightbulbs

This guide appears to be summer 2007 . Its hopelessly out of date and !!

By Mikemaj on   28/01/2009 17:50

Re: Buyer's guide to low energy lightbulbs

The text of the article and the Best Buys advice appeared in the July/August 2007 issue of Ethical Consumer magazine but the scorecard with the brand ratings was accurate as of May 2008.

Unfortunatley, we do not have the time and resources to update all our reports as frequently as we would like - we only research three products for every bi-monthly issue of the magazine.

If you want to access daily updated scorecards and ratings for products, then please subscribe to our www.ethiscore.org site. It only costs an extra £15.50 if you are a magazine subscriber.

By Ethical Consumer on   02/02/2009 12:05

Re: Buyer's guide to low energy lightbulbs

CFLs do use less energy in manufacture and use but produce mercury at the end-of-life stage which is currently diposed of in landfills as household waste as there are no disposal systems in place. These bulbs are already leaking mercury into ground and water supplies and will require vast amounts of energy and money to clean up polluted and toxic water and earth. The introduction of cfls is only half done and will lead to huge problems for future generations if disopsal is not dealth with properly.

By concerned at ostriches on   03/02/2009 16:35

Re: Buyer's guide to low energy lightbulbs

The Middle East, Asia, and China have/use a range of 6000K CFLs that are not available here. This is a pity as they give much more light per watt and require fewer lamps to light a room.

Critics of 6000K colour temperature lamps should see what can be done by using 6000K to provide the bulk of the light, and placing a few 2700K in table or standard lamps to produce warm spots to complement the bright lighting. Many east and far-east hotels use this blend of colour temperatures to good and economical effect, and my own home uses predominately 6000K with some 2700K for their colour warmth.

Alas, the bulk of what is on offer in the West (UK, Europe, and USA) is 2700K; the yellow light from 2700K leads many to (rightly) complain that they do not give enough light.

Making more 6000K lamps available, even if they were all sourced entirely from China initially, would work wonders in getting CFLs widely accepted.

China also has a range of lamps and fittings which are not seen in the West, yet are extremely effieient and economical.

'Going ethical' is forcing us to live with the poor light output of 2700K, but how long will it take for Western manufacturers to give us 6000K?

In the meantime, it is other countries (perhaps some 'unethical' countries) that are now leading the way towards economic high-output CFL lighting.

Charles Miller

cam@millerfirst.com

By Charles Miller on   20/03/2009 14:03

Re: Buyer's guide to low energy lightbulbs

Hmm - looking for some new ceiling light fittings, has anyone else noticed that most retailers use predominantly incandescent lightbulbs to display their wares - this wouldn't be anything to do with the poor light, ugly "efficient" bulbs would it.

When retailers start to use these and they look good then I might consider then - until them forget it.

By Mark on   18/08/2009 20:55

Re: Buyer's guide to low energy lightbulbs

I've been writing the installation dates on the 'collar' of my flourescent low energy bulbs with marker pen. I've just had to replace one after less than 7 months use, in a room I use for perhaps 4-6 hours maximum per week. I find this iis typical, they don't last anything like as long as claimed.

By Paul on   14/02/2010 09:59

Re: Buyer's guide to low energy lightbulbs

I replaced all my old bulbs (except those on dimmers) with the Philips Energy Saver ones that are supported by E-On the energy supplier so should be good quality - Ok I can live with the very slow time to get to full power but the real problem is they don't last - 10,000 hours is stated but already 3 (Three) have failed and that is in less than 1,000 hours ! Maybe I should leave all my lights on all day like Eira Hughes ?

By JW on   15/02/2010 19:56

Add your own comments on this report...


Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Security Code
Enter the code shown above in the box below
Add Comment    Cancel  
   

 
Dissertation Help
Triodos ISA 2010
Co-operative Bank
stop climate chaos
Speechless, a cartoon history of mankind.
greenfibres 2010