Skip to main content
Company ethical profile

Missguided Ltd

Missguided has repeatedly been one of the worst scoring companies in Ethical Consumer’s high-street clothing guides.

Following its purchase by Shein in 2023, have the ethics of fast fashion brand Missguided improved?
 

Associated brands Associated brands FAQ

  • Missguided

Related Shopping Guides

Active boycotts

There are no active boycotts of this company.

Company ethiscore

Subscribe to see this company’s ethiscore.
Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Sign in above.

About company profiles

Since 1989 we've been researching and recording the social and environmental records of companies, and making the results available to you in a simple format.

Learn more about our company profiles   →

Is Missguided ethical?

Missguided hit the headlines in 2022 after the business collapsed, allegedly resulting in workers and suppliers not getting paid for months' worth of orders they had already completed for the company. 

Following its bankruptcy, Missguided is now owned by Elite Depot Limited, the parent company for the Chinese fast fashion giant Shein.

In this profile, we look at the ethics of Missguided, Shein, and the brands’ owner. 

Ethical Consumer always rates company groups as a whole, rather than individual brands, and our research highlights many ethical issues with Elite Depot Limited and its subsidiaries, including accusations of forced labour in supply chains, failure to tackle emissions, and likely use of tax avoidance strategies.

Below we outline some of these issues. To see the full detailed stories, and Missguided’s overall ethical rating, please sign in or subscribe.

Little action to cut emissions

Missguided and Shein are major fast fashion brands – adding tens or even hundreds of thousands of new designs to their websites every year. Outlets like Shein rapidly introduce new items, monitor consumer trends through digital analytics, and swiftly escalate production on popular pieces.

Fast fashion brands like these have therefore fuelled a quick purchase and quick disposal approach to clothing, in an industry which is currently responsible for up to 10% of global carbon emissions every year.

Missguided scores very badly in Ethical Consumer’s climate rating, based on the poor record of the Shein company group.

Although the group had now set targets for reducing its climate impacts in line with international goals, its reporting indicated that its total Scope 3 emissions had risen by 20.3% since 2023. 

TIME magazine criticised Shein in January 2023, stating, "the company leaves about 6.3 million tons of carbon dioxide a year in its trail—a number that falls well below the 45% target to reduce global carbon emissions by 2030, which the U.N. has said is necessary for fashion companies to implement to help limit global warming.”

The website Earth.org also reported in 2025 that "The rapidly-growing Chinese giant recently ranked among the worst fast fashion companies for emissions reduction and sustainability efforts and as the top polluting retailer. Fast fashion retail giant Shein’s carbon footprint increased significantly in 2024, according to the company’s sustainability report."

Accusations of workers’ right abuses

Missguided and its sister brand Shein score poorly in Ethical Consumer’s workers category.

When Shein was rated in August 2026, it was found to have a supply chain policy in place covering some basic criteria like no child labour. However, the policy overlooked important factors like paying the living wage and limiting the number of hours employees are expected to work to under 48 a week. 

In August 2024, Shein publicly stated that it had found two cases of child labour in its supply chain the previous year. The company stated that it had temporarily suspended orders from the suppliers involved, and had resumed sourcing from them once they had made efforts to tackle the problem. 

Civil society groups have repeatedly accused Shein of other abuses in its supply chain. In November 2021, for example, investigative outlet Public Eye published a report, which found that workers in China supplying Shein were working 75 hour weeks – which violated the country’s laws.

Three years later, in May 2024, Public Eye published a follow-up report, which stated that abuses were ongoing. The group accused Shein of using a highly-flexible workforce, which included over 1,000 contractors, to produce its garments at extremely low costs, thereby eroding conditions in the supply chain. The BBC also reported on this story and practice in 2025. 

Shein responded to the allegations, stating that long working hours in the sector were a "common challenge that brands, manufacturers, and other ecosystem players must work together to address".

Allegations of forced labour in cotton supply chain

Shein has also faced accusations that its products contain cotton from the Uyghur Xinjiang Autonomous Region of China. State-sanctioned forced labour is routinely used in cotton harvesting and processing in the Xinjiang region, as part of the Chinese government’s suppression of the Uyghur Muslim ethnic group. Clothing companies have therefore been urged to cease sourcing from the region.

In November 2022, Bloomberg published an investigation titled ‘Shein’s Cotton Tied to Chinese Region Accused of Forced Labor’. It stated, “A US attempt to ban imports of cotton linked to forced labor in China contains a loophole large enough for a multibillion-dollar business to pass through: clothing from Shein, the Chinese online retail giant and social-media phenomenon that ships fast-fashion apparel directly to consumers.

“Laboratory testing conducted for Bloomberg News on two occasions this year found that garments shipped to the US by Shein were made with cotton from China’s Xinjiang region.”

“In a statement, Shein didn’t dispute Bloomberg’s test results or say whether it uses cotton from Xinjiang. The fast-fashion retailer said it takes steps in all its global markets ‘to ensure we comply with local laws and regulations.’”

Shein said it had a zero-tolerance policy for ‘forced labor’, and later stated that “only 2.1%” of its cotton tested positive for unapproved cotton.”

In January 2025, the Guardian reported that a lawyer for Shein, which was seeking to float on the London Stock Exchange, had said she could not answer questions from MPs on the business and trade committee about “whether Shein’s manufacturers – none of which the company owns directly – used the controversial yarn or whether any of them were based in the Xinjiang region”.

Vague animal welfare policy

Missguided sells a range of clothes including animal products such as leather and wool, while other brands owned by Elite Depot Limited also sell animal products such as mohair and angora.

Shein’s animal welfare policy states, “We prefer for our suppliers to source according to recognized third party standards”. However, it does not say what proportion of animal products used are actually certified by any of the listed standards. Other statements in the policy are vague and do not set clear criteria. For example, it states that it expects suppliers to “Work to align with our values of animal welfare”, but does not make clear whether this is a binding criteria.

As such, Shein and Missguided were not considered to have adequate policies in place to ensure animal welfare in their supply chains.

Poor record on tax 

Missguided’s parent company Elite Depot Limited scores poorly in Ethical Consumer’s tax conduct rating. The company is registered in the Cayman Islands, which is a tax haven.

Shein has also been criticised by multiple third parties for alleged tax avoidance.

This Is Money, a financial news site, stated in October 2021, “Chinese fashion giant Shein is exploiting tax perks to undercut Britain's online retailers”. According to the site, “Shein is free from Chinese VAT and consumer taxes and is subject to lower corporation taxes. These incentives are awarded to it for manufacturing in China and then only selling its goods outside the country. Arriving in the UK by post, the parcels are of such low value that they are not subject to import duties as they would be if the goods were delivered to British distribution centres in shipping containers – the method used by other big retailers.”

In July 2023, the clothing news site Fashion Network likewise reiterated the allegations based on the US parliamentary report. It stated that Shein and another Chinese retailer Temu “paid zero dollars” in US custom duties the previous year. “This has prompted a parliamentary enquiry to reveal that the two Chinese e-tailers are circumventing customs by sending hundreds of thousands of small shipments that fall below the customs tariff threshold”, it said.

Shein did not appear to have responded to either allegation.

In September 2025 the Guardian reported that Shein "paid just £9.6m in corporation tax despite taking £2bn in sales last year [...] 'Very little surplus is left in the UK to be subject to corporate income tax,' Paul Monaghan, the chief executive of the Fair Tax Foundation, said."


The text above was written in October 2026 with research conducted in August 2026.

Subscribe to see the full detailed stories about Missguided.

Friday 23rd of October 2026

Ownership structure

About ownership structures

Since 1989 we've been researching and recording the social and environmental records of companies, and making the results available to you in a simple format.

Ethical stories