Amazon is known for its shameless tax avoidance, workers’ rights abuses, environmental impacts and much more. The company has been the subject of an Ethical Consumer global boycott call since 2012.
We’ve summarised the key ethical issues to consider when it comes to Amazon.
Since 1989 we've been researching and recording the social and environmental records of companies, and making the results available to you in a simple format.
Learn more about our company profiles →
Our research highlights many ethical issues for Amazon, including: tax conduct, company ethos, workers' rights, tech sustainability, digital privacy, climate change, conflict minerals, military links, agriculture, palm oil sourcing, packaging, and animal products. The company scored 40 points or less in each of these categories.
Below we outline some of these issues. To see the full detailed stories, and Amazon's overall ethical rating, please sign in or subscribe.
We launched a boycott of Amazon in 2012 over its tax avoidance. This was called because in 2011, as the world's biggest online retailer, Amazon generated UK sales of £2.9bn yet paid only £1.8m in corporation tax. The correct figure should have been over £8 million at the full rate of corporation tax at that time.
Things have become much worse since then.
In 2024, Amazon's UK revenue surged to reach a massive £29 billion. This is 10 times its turnover when Ethical Consumer’s boycott campaign started. Yet, the company continues to underpay its taxes and withhold details of its actual profits. While it proudly states that it paid just over £1 billion in direct taxes that year, it remains unclear what level of profit those tax payments were based on.
Paul Monaghan, chief executive of Ethical Consumer's sister organisation, the Fair Tax Foundation said: “Amazon are once again tactically releasing their total tax contribution calculation to distract attention away from the pitifully low levels of corporation tax that have been contributed by Amazon UK Services over recent years. The public are not interested in how much VAT Amazon has collected and passed on to the Government. They want to know how much profit they actually account for in the UK from the £29billion of revenue they collect here. One can only surmise that the lack of transparency is connected to the sizeable chunk of UK revenue that is still shunted to the historically ‘loss-making’ subsidiary in Luxembourg."
In 2024, Ethical Consumer research estimates that Amazon's corporation tax avoidance alone may have Amazon’s substantial tax avoidance in the UK cost the UK public purse over £575 million. How does Amazon's tax strategy impact public services and ethical consumer choices? Explore the full details of Amazon's tax avoidance on our boycott page.
Executive compensation at Amazon shows a significant disparity:
This highlights a stark contrast in pay within the company.
What are the ethical implications of Amazon's move into nuclear power? Amazon invested £500 million in small modular nuclear reactors in October 2024 to power AWS data centers. This move raises ethical questions regarding environmental impact and long-term energy solutions, sparking debate on its alignment with sustainability goals.
Earlier this year, together with Google and Meta, Amazon signed a pledge to support efforts to at least triple nuclear energy worldwide by 2050.
It also lost points for membership of various lobby groups such as the World Economic Forum, Eurocommerce or the Business Roundtable. These organisations tend to exert undue corporate influence on policy-makers in favour of market solutions that are potentially detrimental to the environment and human rights.
Amazon reports on its business practices but maintains deep military ties.
The company has no policy prohibiting work with the military and has secured 137 US Department of Defense contracts since 2020, including a $581.3 million deal to provide cloud services for the Air Force's Cloud One program "designed to provide secure, scalable computing environments for weapons systems, command-and-control applications, intelligence processing, and business systems."
While Amazon frames this as supporting mission-critical work, critics revealed that "Amazon sold cloud-computing services to two Israeli weapons manufacturers whose munitions helped devastate Gaza" during periods when Israel's military was using their products to indiscriminately kill civilians and destroy civil infrastructure.
Through its Joint Warfighting Cloud Capability contract, AWS continues providing "secure, reliable, and mission-critical cloud services" to the US Department of Defense, enabling them to deploy their cloud environments to “meet the needs of their mission”.
Amazon.com, through Amazon Web Services (AWS) signed a $1.22 billion (£0.9bn) contract with the Israeli state in 2021, alongside Google. Known as Project Nimbus, it promised vast cloud storage, artificial intelligence tools, and analytics to “the Government, the Security Services and other entities.”
Nimbus provides the backbone for Israel’s apartheid regime and its war on Gaza. Despite Amazon’s claims to publicly characterise Nimbus as a civilian project, Israeli officials themselves have credited the project with giving the military new capabilities during airstrikes.
We have a separate article on Amazon's links with Israel.
Amazon is renowned for its poor treatment of its workers.
The Centre for Law and Work together with Berkeley University of California published a document in 2022 pointing out that in spite of all Amazon’s claims, “it absolutely does not” comply with international labour standards.
On many occasions Amazon has aggressively opposed unionisation and organising efforts at its warehouses.
In April 2024, GMB filed legal proceedings against Amazon. The union claims Amazon has engaged in widespread attempts to coerce staff to cancel their trade union membership. Union recognition would mean Amazon would be forced to sit down with GMB on matters relating to pay, hours, and holidays.
Amazon's anti-union efforts have significant implications for workers' rights. The company has spent spent tens of millions on anti-union consultants, raising serious concerns about fair treatment and collective bargaining. This investment undermines ethical labor practices within the company.
Amazon suppliers don’t receive better treatment either from the company. Amazon was listed in the UK’s Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA) survey for the first time in 2023.
Amazon has been consistently name the worst food retailer annually. Why does Amazon consistently rank poorly in supplier surveys, and what measures are being taken to address these issues and improve relationships with suppliers? Explore the underlying reasons for this recurring problem.
The GCA is responsible for encouraging, monitoring and enforcing compliance with the Code and thus for regulating the relationships between the UK's largest grocery retailers and their direct suppliers. Perhaps unsurprisingly Amazon jumped straight to the last place of the list with almost four times as many accusations of code violations as the next company up.
Amazon sources conflict minerals and cotton without adequately stringent policies for protecting human rights. This is a concern because these products are at risk of being sourced from places where human rights abuses occur, including Turkmenistan (in the cotton sector) and the Democratic Republic of Congo (conflict minerals). Much more is needed than vague commitments to ensure the supply chain is free from violations.
In June 2023 Amazon agreed to pay $25 million (£18.5m) in fines to settle alleged privacy violations. These involved its voice assistant Alexa and doorbell camera Ring. US’s Federal Trade Commission claims in one lawsuit that the tech company kept recordings of children's conversations with its voice assistant Alexa but failed to delete them – as it had promised it would – when parents asked it to do so.
Amazon agreed to pay another $5.8 million, because Ring had allowed employees and contractors to watch recordings of customers' private spaces, sometimes including bedrooms and bathrooms.
Amazon reports on its greenhouse gas emissions but it uses loopholes to make it look to be in a better shape than it really is.
Amazon's reported Scope 2 emissions are misleadingly low due to its market-based reporting method. The Guardian calculates Amazon's actual Scope 2 emissions to be 1.2 times higher than claimed, indicating a worrying trend in its environmental reporting accuracy.
Amazon's Scope 3 emissions, the largest for most organizations, lack comprehensive accounting. A private report reveals Amazon drastically undercounts its carbon footprint by only fully accounting for products with an Amazon brand label. How accurate is Amazon's environmental reporting, and what steps can be taken to improve transparency and accountability?
According to Amazon Employees for Climate Justice, an organisation of Amazon corporate workers who care about climate justice, Amazon branded products account for as little as 1% of all goods and services. This suggests that Amazon’s scope 3 emissions could be 100 times higher than claimed by the company.
Alberto Carrillo Pineda, managing director of the Science Based Targets initiative said "Under the [Greenhouse Gas] protocol, retail companies should be counting all the products they sell directly to consumers”. The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) is a corporate climate action organisation that enables companies and financial institutions worldwide to play their part in combating the climate crisis.
Amazon Web Services (AWS), Amazon’s market leading cloud computing arm, currently owns about a third of the entire cloud market. In 2018, WikiLeaks disclosed the locations of more than 100 AWS data centres around the world. Over fifty were in the US and several in known tax havens, such as Luxembourg, Singapore and most famously, Ireland.
The environmental impact of large data centers, particularly AWS, is substantial:
Amazon Employees for Climate Justice recently says that in spite of the company claiming that its operations are run entirely on renewable sources of power, in truth just 22 percent of power used by the company's data centres is from renewables.
Amazon has no policy for genetically modified organisms, the use of pesticides, or agricultural run-off. It stated in its 2022 Sustainability report that it aims to reduce its agricultural impact but it largely discussed funding relevant projects as opposed to addressing its own impacts.
Amazon does address reducing water use in its supply chain. It has an active stewardship programme in its operations in India and it achieved a Water Neutrality Index (WNI) of 1. The WNI defines “water neutral” as the amount of water conserved being equal to the quantity of water consumed, with a score of 1.
The mass production of palm oil relies on the destruction of rainforests. This has wide ranging impacts including contributing to climate change, as well as loss of biodiversity and human rights.
Some of Amazon’s products come from a physically certified supply chain but less than 50% does, meaning that half of its palm is untraceable and could potentially be connected to abuses of rainforests and people.
As a company that relies on packaging, it has no evidence of plans to reduce packaging in its supply chain or the packaging of its products. Excessive packaging leads to wasted resources like paper and oil (to make plastic), as well as environmental impacts when it is thrown away.
Recycling company Business Waste has called out the company and suggested that it takes cardboard boxes back from customers to increase recycling rates. In the UK a third of all the cardboard may end up in landfill. Business Waste believes that Amazon needs to take some responsibility for its packaging.
It has, though, reduced per-shipment packaging weight by 41% on average since 2015. Analysts however, believe that Amazon delivers more than 10 million customer packages every day.
Amazon uses its vast ecosystem to create comprehensive user profiles that raise major concerns. The company openly admits in its privacy policy: "We use your personal information to display interest-based ads for features, products, and services that might be of interest to you" – a practice that critics say amounts to digital profiling.
While Amazon claims no evidence of using user data for AI training, its multi-service approach combining data from shopping, streaming, cloud services, and smart home devices creates a detailed picture of users that would be impossible to piece together through any single service.
The criticism extends to its voice assistant, with reports that Amazon plans to eliminate local Alexa processing and send all voice requests to the cloud, meaning every spoken command gets stored and analysed
Amazon owns various tech products such as its Kindle, Amazon Echo Dot or its Fire tablets but scores badly when it comes to tech sustainability.
The repairability and warranty on its tech devices are all at the lower end of the scale. It does, however, use a fair amount of recycled materials in the devices. It says that some of its products are made from majority- or all-recycled content. Some for example contain 75% recycled plastic,100% recycled aluminium, and 90% recycled magnesium. It also claims to have incorporated 50% recycled plastic into certain power adapters that ship with its devices.
Amazon has an all round inadequate animal welfare policy.
It has no policy on animal testing, sells products made of factory farmed animals and sells live animals, such as lobsters on its website. Fur coats made of racoons, rabbits and chinchillas are also for sale on its website.
It was criticised by PETA in 2023 for its “continued sale of Thai coconut milk even after learning of PETA Asia’s investigations revealing that monkeys are forced to pick coconuts in Thailand and are trained through fear of punishment, caged in isolation, and chained for life”.
It prohibits listings relating to endangered species, but only in line with the law, so it’s really doing the bare minimum when it comes to the wellbeing of other species.
More information on all these topics is on our Boycott Amazon page.
The majority of the text above was written in September 2025, and was based on research mainly conducted in August 2024 and August 2025. The sections on digital privacy and military links were researched and written in spring-summer 2026.
You can subscribe to see the full detailed stories about Amazon.
Looking for ethical alternatives to Amazon?
Many options exist for consumers who wish to avoid supporting unethical businesses.
Our Alternatives to Amazon series provides comprehensive information, including:
We have created a pledge to avoid Amazon for a month.
Take the pledge and receive tips and support to keep you going during the month of avoiding Amazon. We give you alternatives and reasons why to avoid shopping with Amazon.
Email Amazon to let them know what you think of their ethics.
We always check the ethics of our advertisers