Is it always more eco-friendly to buy secondhand?
For the vast majority of items – including clothing, books and furniture – it will always be more environmentally-friendly to buy secondhand. However, this may not be the case for some electronic goods that consume large amounts of energy while in use.
Over the years, electronics, particularly household appliances, have become more and more energy efficient, meaning that a fridge designed in 2025 will require much less electricity than one manufactured in 2015.
If your main concern is the climate impacts from your purchase, you’ll want to think about both the carbon footprint from this use (known as the ‘use-phase carbon footprint’) and the carbon footprint from the item's production (known as the ‘embodied carbon footprint’).
This is particularly true for fridges and freezers, which are switched on 24/7, meaning that they are much more energy-hungry than other appliances. As a general rule of thumb, you may actually cut your carbon footprint if you replace a ten-year old fridge with a new energy efficient model, so think about this when considering whether to buy secondhand. If you do choose to buy a pre-owned fridge or freezer, always check the energy rating of the secondhand option to see how it compares to newer models. (We explain energy ratings and how to check them in a separate article.)
Likewise, using a new induction hob is likely to have a lower carbon footprint than a secondhand gas one if considered over a 20-year period.
For items like washing machines and dishwashers, though, hanging on to your old model, getting it repaired if possible, or buying secondhand is likely to be the more eco-friendly choice.
Is it more eco-friendly to collect or pay for delivery?
Historically, studies have suggested that shopping online was more carbon efficient than buying on the high-street. For example, a 2013 MIT study found bricks-and-mortar shopping to have double the carbon footprint of online shopping. Deliveries were essentially more efficient than everyone driving to and from their chosen shop, as they collated journeys in a given area.
Whether this logic also applies to buying secondhand goods, though, is less clear. Driving a short distance to collect a table yourself will likely be more carbon efficient than getting one delivered from the other side of the country. And cycling or walking to collect items will certainly be more eco-friendly. If you’re able to, ordering items to a central pickup point (e.g. a local cornershop or postoffice) will also have a lower carbon footprint than getting them delivered at home.
The vast majority of the emissions from a product, though, are very likely to be associated with its manufacture, rather than miles travelled. By buying secondhand, you’re already significantly cutting your carbon footprint – an important choice whatever delivery option you go for.